|
Preface |
6 |
|
|
Contents |
10 |
|
|
Contributors |
12 |
|
|
Chapter 1: Ranking Decision Making Units: The Cross-Efficiency Evaluation |
15 |
|
|
1.1 Introduction |
15 |
|
|
1.2 Ranking Methods in DEA |
17 |
|
|
1.3 The Cross-Efficiency Evaluation: The Standard Approach |
18 |
|
|
1.4 The Choice of DEA Weights in Cross-Efficiency Evaluations |
20 |
|
|
1.4.1 Ranking Ranges and Cross-Efficiency Intervals |
25 |
|
|
1.4.2 Illustrative Example |
27 |
|
|
1.5 The Aggregation of Cross-Efficiencies |
30 |
|
|
1.5.1 Illustrative Example (Cont.) |
33 |
|
|
1.6 Other Uses |
34 |
|
|
1.6.1 Identification of Mavericks and All-Round Performers |
34 |
|
|
1.6.2 Classification of DMUs and Benchmarking |
35 |
|
|
1.6.3 Fixed Cost and Resource Allocation |
35 |
|
|
1.7 Extensions |
36 |
|
|
1.7.1 Cross-Efficiency Evaluation with Directional Distance Functions |
36 |
|
|
1.7.2 Cross-Efficiency Evaluation with Multiplicative DEA Models |
36 |
|
|
1.7.3 Cross-Efficiency Evaluation Under VRS |
37 |
|
|
1.7.4 Fuzzy Cross-Efficiency Evaluation |
38 |
|
|
1.7.5 Game Cross Efficiency |
39 |
|
|
1.8 Conclusions |
39 |
|
|
References |
40 |
|
|
Chapter 2: Data Envelopment Analysis for Measuring Environmental Performance |
44 |
|
|
2.1 Introduction |
44 |
|
|
2.2 Environmental DEA Technology |
45 |
|
|
2.3 Models for Measuring Environmental Performance |
48 |
|
|
2.3.1 Environmental Efficiency Index |
48 |
|
|
2.3.2 Environmental Productivity Index |
50 |
|
|
2.3.3 Other Developments |
51 |
|
|
2.4 Case Study |
52 |
|
|
2.4.1 Data |
52 |
|
|
2.4.2 Results and Discussions |
53 |
|
|
2.4.2.1 EEI Analysis |
53 |
|
|
2.4.2.2 EPI Analysis |
58 |
|
|
2.5 Conclusion |
59 |
|
|
References |
61 |
|
|
Chapter 3: Input and Output Search in DEA: The Case of Financial Institutions |
63 |
|
|
3.1 Introduction |
63 |
|
|
3.2 Efficiency Modeling in Financial Institutions |
65 |
|
|
3.3 A Case Study: American Banks |
67 |
|
|
3.3.1 The Data Set: Three Inputs and Three Outputs |
68 |
|
|
3.3.1.1 Labor |
68 |
|
|
3.3.1.2 Physical Capital |
68 |
|
|
3.3.1.3 Deposits |
68 |
|
|
3.3.1.4 Interest and Non-interest Income |
71 |
|
|
3.3.1.5 Loans |
71 |
|
|
3.3.2 DEA Specification Searches Using Multivariate Methods |
79 |
|
|
3.3.3 Results Visualization and Strategic Pattern Identification |
85 |
|
|
3.3.4 Dissecting the Efficiency Score |
94 |
|
|
3.4 Conclusions |
95 |
|
|
References |
96 |
|
|
Chapter 4: Multi-period Efficiency Measurement with Fuzzy Data and Weight Restrictions |
100 |
|
|
4.1 Introduction |
100 |
|
|
4.2 Crisp Network DEA with Weight Restrictions |
102 |
|
|
4.3 Fuzzy Multi-period Efficiency with Weight Restrictions |
106 |
|
|
4.4 Example |
111 |
|
|
4.5 Conclusion |
120 |
|
|
References |
121 |
|
|
Chapter 5: Pitching DEA Against SFA in the Context of Chinese Domestic Versus Foreign Banks |
123 |
|
|
5.1 Introduction |
123 |
|
|
5.2 Conceptual Framework |
125 |
|
|
5.2.1 Chinese Banking Sector |
125 |
|
|
5.2.2 Modeling Performance to Estimate Bank Efficiency |
127 |
|
|
5.2.3 Contextual Variables |
128 |
|
|
5.3 Data and Method |
129 |
|
|
5.3.1 Data |
129 |
|
|
5.3.2 Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) |
132 |
|
|
5.3.3 Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA) |
135 |
|
|
5.4 Results and Analysis |
137 |
|
|
5.4.1 Testing for Scale Inefficiency Using DEA |
137 |
|
|
5.4.2 Main DEA Results |
138 |
|
|
5.4.2.1 Core Model (Single-Output BCC-O) |
138 |
|
|
5.4.2.2 Extended Model (Two-Output BCC-O) |
139 |
|
|
Overall Potential Improvements Identified by DEA Using the Extended Model |
140 |
|
|
Assessing the Marginal Role of the Output Variables in DEA: Efficiency Contribution Measures (ECM) for the Extended Model |
140 |
|
|
5.4.3 SFA Results |
142 |
|
|
5.4.3.1 Core Model (Single-Output Translog Function) |
142 |
|
|
5.4.3.2 Extended Model (Two-Output Translog Function) |
146 |
|
|
5.4.4 Comparing DEA and SFA Results |
146 |
|
|
5.5 Concluding Remarks |
149 |
|
|
References |
151 |
|
|
Chapter 6: Assessing Organizations´ Efficiency Adopting Complementary Perspectives: An Empirical Analysis Through Data Envelop... |
154 |
|
|
6.1 Introduction |
155 |
|
|
6.2 DEA and MDS Methodologies: A Brief Overview |
156 |
|
|
6.2.1 The Data Envelopment Analysis Method |
156 |
|
|
6.2.2 The Multidimensional Scaling Method |
157 |
|
|
6.3 Data and Selection of Indicators |
158 |
|
|
6.3.1 Our Sample |
158 |
|
|
6.3.2 Inputs and Outputs Employed in the DEA Analysis |
159 |
|
|
6.3.3 Indicators Included in the MDS Analysis |
160 |
|
|
6.4 Studying HEIs´ Efficiency by Means of Data Envelopment Analysis: Results |
161 |
|
|
6.5 Combining DEA and MDS Methodologies: Results |
163 |
|
|
6.5.1 Preliminary Insights |
163 |
|
|
6.6 Results |
168 |
|
|
6.7 Concluding Remarks |
171 |
|
|
Appendix: List of Universities Included in the Analysis and Their Acronyms |
172 |
|
|
References |
173 |
|
|
Chapter 7: Capital Stock and Performance of RandD Organizations: A Dynamic DEA-ANP Hybrid Approach |
176 |
|
|
7.1 Introduction |
177 |
|
|
7.2 Literature Review |
179 |
|
|
7.2.1 Current Status of Taiwanese RandD Organizations |
179 |
|
|
7.2.2 DEA Applications in RandD Organizations |
180 |
|
|
7.3 Research Design |
181 |
|
|
7.3.1 Three-Stage Value-Creation Process of RandD Organizations |
181 |
|
|
7.3.2 Data Selection and Description |
183 |
|
|
7.3.3 Dynamic Extension of Network Slack-Based Measure DEA Model |
184 |
|
|
7.4 Results and Discussions |
187 |
|
|
7.4.1 Performance Analysis in Value-Creation Process |
187 |
|
|
7.4.2 The Relationship Between Capital Stock and RandD Organizations Performance |
190 |
|
|
7.5 Conclusions |
192 |
|
|
References |
193 |
|
|
Chapter 8: Evaluating Returns to Scale and Convexity in DEA Via Bootstrap: A Case Study with Brazilian Port Terminals |
196 |
|
|
8.1 Introduction |
196 |
|
|
8.2 Efficiency Measurement and RTS Characterization |
198 |
|
|
8.2.1 Measuring Efficiency Scores Under Different Orientations and Frontiers |
198 |
|
|
8.2.2 Scaling or RTS Characterization |
201 |
|
|
8.2.3 Orientation Impact on RTS Characterization |
202 |
|
|
8.3 Estimation and Bootstrapping in DEA |
203 |
|
|
8.3.1 Estimation |
203 |
|
|
8.3.2 Bootstrapping Method |
205 |
|
|
8.4 Case Study: Brazilian Port Terminals |
206 |
|
|
8.5 Results |
210 |
|
|
8.5.1 Initial Estimates |
210 |
|
|
8.5.2 Preliminary Statistics Tests on Initial Estimates |
213 |
|
|
8.5.2.1 Testing for Model Specification |
214 |
|
|
8.5.2.2 Testing for Differences Between Container and Bulk Terminals |
214 |
|
|
8.5.2.3 Testing for Relevant Inputs and Outputs |
215 |
|
|
8.5.2.4 Testing for Outliers |
216 |
|
|
8.5.3 Bootstrapped Efficiency Scores and Convexity Assumption |
217 |
|
|
8.5.4 RTS Characterizations: CIs for SI and uo |
218 |
|
|
8.5.5 Discussion |
220 |
|
|
8.6 Conclusions |
220 |
|
|
References |
221 |
|
|
9: DEA and Cooperative Game Theory |
224 |
|
|
9.1 Introduction |
224 |
|
|
9.2 Cooperative Game Theory |
225 |
|
|
9.2.1 Bargaining Problems |
225 |
|
|
9.2.1.1 The Nash Solution |
226 |
|
|
9.2.1.2 The Kalai-Smorodinsky Solution |
228 |
|
|
9.2.2 Transferable Utility Games |
229 |
|
|
9.2.2.1 The Core and Related Concepts |
230 |
|
|
9.2.2.2 The Shapley Value |
230 |
|
|
9.2.2.3 The Least Core and the Nucleolus |
232 |
|
|
9.3 Nash Bargaining Approaches to DEA |
232 |
|
|
9.4 TU Cooperative Game Approaches to DEA |
236 |
|
|
9.5 Further Potential Applications |
239 |
|
|
9.5.1 Nash Decomposition for Process Efficiency in Multistage Production Systems |
240 |
|
|
9.5.2 DEA Production Games |
242 |
|
|
References |
245 |
|
|
Chapter 10: Measuring Bank Performance: From Static Black Box to Dynamic Network Models |
249 |
|
|
10.1 Introduction |
250 |
|
|
10.2 Selective Literature Review |
251 |
|
|
10.2.1 Network DEA and Dynamic DEA |
251 |
|
|
10.2.2 Bank Production and Risk |
253 |
|
|
10.3 Preliminaries |
254 |
|
|
10.3.1 Black-Box Technology |
254 |
|
|
10.3.2 Network Technology with Bad Outputs |
255 |
|
|
10.3.3 Dynamic Technology with Carryovers |
256 |
|
|
10.3.4 Dynamic-Network Technology |
258 |
|
|
10.4 DEA Implementation |
260 |
|
|
10.5 A Choice of Variables and Regulatory Constraints |
268 |
|
|
10.5.1 Variable Selection: An Example |
268 |
|
|
10.5.2 Imposing Bank Regulatory Constraint |
269 |
|
|
10.6 A Summary |
271 |
|
|
References |
271 |
|
|
Chapter 11: Evaluation and Decomposition of Energy and Environmental Productivity Change Using DEA |
275 |
|
|
11.1 Introduction |
276 |
|
|
11.2 Luenberger Productivity Indicator and Its Decomposition |
278 |
|
|
11.3 DEA Model for Energy and Environmental Efficiency Measurement |
285 |
|
|
11.4 Application to China´s Regional Energy and Environmental Productivity Change |
289 |
|
|
11.4.1 Data and Variables |
290 |
|
|
11.4.2 Results and Discussions |
293 |
|
|
11.5 Conclusions |
303 |
|
|
References |
304 |
|
|
Chapter 12: Identifying the Global Reference Set in DEA: An Application to the Determination of Returns to Scale |
306 |
|
|
12.1 Introduction |
307 |
|
|
Part I: On Identification of the Global Reference Set |
308 |
|
|
Part II: On Determination of the RTS |
310 |
|
|
12.2 Background |
311 |
|
|
12.2.1 Technology Set |
311 |
|
|
12.2.2 The RAM Model |
312 |
|
|
12.3 Identifying the Global Reference Set (GRS) |
312 |
|
|
12.3.1 Definition of the GRS |
312 |
|
|
12.3.2 Properties of the GRS |
314 |
|
|
12.3.3 Identification of the GRS |
316 |
|
|
12.3.4 Properties of the Proposed Approach |
320 |
|
|
12.3.5 Numerical example |
321 |
|
|
12.4 Determination of Returns to Scale (RTS) |
323 |
|
|
12.4.1 Definition of RTS for an Inefficient DMU |
323 |
|
|
12.4.2 Determination of RTS Via the BCC Model |
323 |
|
|
12.4.3 Determination of RTS Via the CCR Model |
325 |
|
|
12.4.4 Numerical Example |
326 |
|
|
12.4.4.1 Determining RTS Statuses of the DMUs Using Algorithm I |
327 |
|
|
12.4.4.2 Determining RTS Statuses of the DMUs Using Algorithm II |
327 |
|
|
12.5 Empirical Application |
328 |
|
|
12.5.1 Evaluation of Schools via the RAM Model |
329 |
|
|
12.5.2 Determining RTS Statuses of the Efficient Schools |
329 |
|
|
12.5.3 Determining RTS Statuses of the Inefficient Schools |
329 |
|
|
12.6 Summary and Concluding Remarks |
333 |
|
|
References |
334 |
|
|
Chapter 13: Technometrics Study Using DEA on Hybrid Electric Vehicles (HEVs) |
338 |
|
|
13.1 Introduction |
339 |
|
|
13.2 Methodology |
339 |
|
|
13.3 Research Model and Dataset |
342 |
|
|
13.3.1 TFDEA Parameters |
342 |
|
|
13.3.1.1 Input Variable |
342 |
|
|
13.3.1.2 Output Variables |
343 |
|
|
13.3.1.3 Categorical Parameter |
344 |
|
|
13.3.2 Dataset |
344 |
|
|
13.4 Analysis of the Technological Advancement Patterns |
346 |
|
|
13.4.1 Two-Seaters and Compact Segments: ``Stagnated´´ |
347 |
|
|
13.4.2 Midsize Segment: ``Flourishing´´ |
348 |
|
|
13.4.3 Large Segment: ``Emerging´´ |
349 |
|
|
13.4.4 SUV Segment: ``Forging Ahead´´ |
351 |
|
|
13.4.5 Minivan Segment: ``Crossover´´ |
351 |
|
|
13.4.6 Pickup Truck Segment: ``Steady´´ |
352 |
|
|
13.5 Conclusion |
352 |
|
|
Appendix: 2013 State-of-the-Art Frontiers of Different HEV Segments |
353 |
|
|
References |
354 |
|
|
Chapter 14: A Radial Framework for Estimating the Efficiency and Returns to Scale of a Multi-component Production System in DEA |
357 |
|
|
14.1 Introduction |
358 |
|
|
14.2 Radial Performance Measurement for a Multi-component System |
360 |
|
|
14.2.1 Basic Model |
361 |
|
|
14.2.2 Theoretical Connection with Black-Box Approach |
363 |
|
|
14.3 Procedure for Estimating the Returns to Scale |
368 |
|
|
14.4 Theoretical Connection Between Black Box Approach and Multi-component Approach |
374 |
|
|
14.5 Application |
375 |
|
|
14.5.1 Efficiency |
376 |
|
|
14.5.2 Returns to Scale |
381 |
|
|
14.6 Summary and Conclusion |
382 |
|
|
Appendix |
383 |
|
|
References |
389 |
|
|
Chapter 15: DEA and Accounting Performance Measurement |
391 |
|
|
15.1 Introduction |
391 |
|
|
15.2 Accounting Information |
392 |
|
|
15.3 Accounting Ratios for Performance Measurement |
395 |
|
|
15.4 Accounting Information and Its Interpretation in Productivity Measurement |
398 |
|
|
15.4.1 Model 1: Production Process |
400 |
|
|
15.4.2 Model 2: Firm Financial Efficiency Model |
401 |
|
|
15.4.3 Model 3: Funding Efficiency Model |
401 |
|
|
15.5 Indexing Dollar Values and Translation of Foreign Currencies |
402 |
|
|
15.6 Activity-Based Costing and DEA: Congenial Twins |
404 |
|
|
15.7 DEA and the Balanced Scorecard: A New Approach to an Old Problem |
408 |
|
|
15.8 Understanding Contextual Performance to ``Do Better´´ |
410 |
|
|
15.9 Summary |
415 |
|
|
References |
415 |
|
|
Chapter 16: DEA Environmental Assessment (I): Concepts and Methodologies |
419 |
|
|
16.1 Introduction |
420 |
|
|
16.2 Literature Review |
422 |
|
|
16.3 Underlying Concepts for DEA Environmental Assessment |
422 |
|
|
16.3.1 Abbreviations and nomenclatures |
422 |
|
|
16.3.2 Natural and Managerial Disposability |
423 |
|
|
16.3.3 Unification Between Natural and Managerial Disposability |
424 |
|
|
16.3.4 Desirable Congestion (DC) |
426 |
|
|
16.4 Unified Efficiency |
427 |
|
|
16.4.1 Unified Efficiency (UE) |
427 |
|
|
16.4.2 Unified Efficiency under Natural Disposability (UEN) |
430 |
|
|
16.4.3 Unified Efficiency under Managerial Disposability (UEM) |
431 |
|
|
16.4.4 Unified Efficiency under Natural and Managerial Disposability (UENM) |
432 |
|
|
16.4.5 Unified Efficiency under Natural and Managerial Disposability: UENM(DC) with a Possible Occurrence of Desirable Congest... |
434 |
|
|
16.5 Investment Strategy |
435 |
|
|
16.6 Empirical Study |
436 |
|
|
16.7 Conclusion and Future Extensions |
442 |
|
|
References |
449 |
|
|
Chapter 17: DEA Environmental Assessment (II): A Literature Study |
451 |
|
|
17.1 Introduction |
452 |
|
|
17.2 DEA Environmental Assessment |
453 |
|
|
17.3 Disposability Concepts |
456 |
|
|
17.4 Electric Power Industry |
462 |
|
|
17.5 Petroleum and Coal Industries |
463 |
|
|
17.6 Agriculture, Fishery, Manufacturing and Transportation Industries |
464 |
|
|
17.7 Economic Development and Corporate Strategy |
465 |
|
|
17.8 Methodology Developments |
466 |
|
|
17.9 Conclusion |
468 |
|
|
References |
469 |
|
|
Chapter 18: Corporate Environmental Sustainability and DEA |
488 |
|
|
18.1 Introduction |
488 |
|
|
18.2 Corporate Environmental Sustainability |
489 |
|
|
18.3 Theory Testing and Statistical Inferencing with DEA: An Environmental Perspective |
490 |
|
|
18.3.1 Financial and Environmental Performance Relationship |
491 |
|
|
18.3.2 Ecological Efficiency and Technological Disposition Relationship |
492 |
|
|
18.3.3 Environmental Practices, Performance and Risk Management |
493 |
|
|
18.4 Benchmarking and Key Performance Indicators with DEA |
494 |
|
|
18.5 Multiple Criteria Decision Making with DEA |
496 |
|
|
18.5.1 Justifying and Choosing Environmental Technologies |
497 |
|
|
18.6 Future Research Directions |
498 |
|
|
18.7 Conclusion |
500 |
|
|
References |
501 |
|
|
Index |
504 |
|