|
Foreword |
6 |
|
|
Measuring Common Ground: Bertelsmann Stiftung’s Social Cohesion Radar |
6 |
|
|
Acknowledgements |
12 |
|
|
Contents |
13 |
|
|
About the Authors |
16 |
|
|
List of Figures |
18 |
|
|
List of Tables |
20 |
|
|
Introduction |
23 |
|
|
References |
29 |
|
|
1 Theoretical Framework of the Social Cohesion Radar |
31 |
|
|
Abstract |
31 |
|
|
1.1 Roots in (Modern) Classics |
31 |
|
|
1.2 Previous Research on Cohesion |
34 |
|
|
1.3 Definition of Social Cohesion |
36 |
|
|
1.4 Disambiguation |
39 |
|
|
References |
42 |
|
|
2 Methodology of the Social Cohesion Radar |
44 |
|
|
Abstract |
44 |
|
|
2.1 Countries and Time Periods |
45 |
|
|
2.2 Secondary Data Sources |
46 |
|
|
2.2.1 Survey Data |
47 |
|
|
2.2.2 Expert Ratings |
49 |
|
|
2.2.3 Institutional Data |
49 |
|
|
2.3 Method: A Step-by-Step Guide |
50 |
|
|
2.3.1 Initial Selection of Indicators |
50 |
|
|
2.3.2 Data Preparation |
52 |
|
|
2.3.3 Reducing the Number of Indicators |
53 |
|
|
2.3.4 Final Selection of Indicators |
54 |
|
|
2.3.5 Reflective Measurement of Dimensions |
55 |
|
|
2.3.6 Completion of Dimension Scores |
58 |
|
|
2.3.7 Formative Measurement of Social Cohesion |
59 |
|
|
2.3.8 Limitations of the Approach |
60 |
|
|
2.3.9 Five-Color Grouping Scheme |
60 |
|
|
References |
61 |
|
|
3 Level and Trend of Social Cohesion |
64 |
|
|
Abstract |
64 |
|
|
3.1 Overall Index of Cohesion |
64 |
|
|
3.1.1 Most Recent Wave, 2009–2012 |
65 |
|
|
3.1.2 Overall Index Changes Over Time |
66 |
|
|
3.2 Domains of Cohesion |
66 |
|
|
3.2.1 Social Relations |
66 |
|
|
3.2.2 Connectedness |
68 |
|
|
3.2.3 Focus on the Common Good |
68 |
|
|
3.3 Dimensions of Cohesion |
68 |
|
|
3.3.1 Social Relations, Trust in People, Acceptance of Diversity |
69 |
|
|
3.3.2 Identification, Trust in Institutions, Perception of Fairness |
69 |
|
|
3.3.3 Solidarity and Helpfulness, Respect for Social Rules, Civic Participation |
72 |
|
|
References |
74 |
|
|
4 Syndrome Character and Regimes of Social Cohesion |
75 |
|
|
Abstract |
75 |
|
|
4.1 Syndrome Character |
76 |
|
|
4.2 Regimes of Social Cohesion |
79 |
|
|
4.2.1 Nordic Regime |
81 |
|
|
4.2.2 English-Speaking and Small Western European Regime |
83 |
|
|
4.2.3 Northwestern European Regime |
83 |
|
|
4.2.4 Mediterranean and Eastern European Regime |
84 |
|
|
4.2.5 Levantine Regime |
84 |
|
|
4.2.6 Southeastern European Regime |
84 |
|
|
References |
85 |
|
|
5 Macro-Level Causes and Effects of Social Cohesion |
87 |
|
|
Abstract |
87 |
|
|
5.1 Determinants and Outcomes of the Overall Index |
88 |
|
|
5.1.1 Wealth and Economic Situation |
89 |
|
|
5.1.2 Income Inequality and the Welfare State |
91 |
|
|
5.1.3 Demographics |
91 |
|
|
5.1.4 Structural Modernization |
92 |
|
|
5.1.5 Diversity |
92 |
|
|
5.1.6 Culture and Values |
93 |
|
|
5.1.7 Subjective Well-Being |
93 |
|
|
5.2 Determinants and Outcomes of the Single Dimensions |
94 |
|
|
5.2.1 Wealth and Economic Situation |
94 |
|
|
5.2.2 Income Inequality and the Welfare State |
98 |
|
|
5.2.3 Demographics |
99 |
|
|
5.2.4 Structural Modernization |
100 |
|
|
5.2.5 Diversity |
101 |
|
|
5.2.6 Culture and Values |
101 |
|
|
5.2.7 Subjective Well-Being |
102 |
|
|
5.3 The Strongest Determinants of Social Cohesion |
102 |
|
|
References |
104 |
|
|
6 Social Cohesion, Values of Individuals, and Their Well-being |
106 |
|
|
Abstract |
106 |
|
|
6.1 Individual Values and Social Cohesion |
107 |
|
|
6.2 Social Cohesion and the Well-Being of Individuals |
111 |
|
|
6.2.1 Well-Being of Individuals Is Higher in More Cohesive Countries |
115 |
|
|
6.2.2 Cohesive Societies Are Good for Everyone |
115 |
|
|
References |
118 |
|
|
7 A Case Study: Social Cohesion in Germany |
120 |
|
|
Abstract |
120 |
|
|
7.1 Data and Methods |
121 |
|
|
7.1.1 Secondary Data Sources |
121 |
|
|
7.1.1.1 Survey Data |
121 |
|
|
7.1.1.2 Institutional Data |
123 |
|
|
7.1.2 Method |
123 |
|
|
7.2 Level and Trend of Cohesion |
125 |
|
|
7.3 Determinants of Cohesion |
128 |
|
|
7.4 Subjective Well-Being as Outcome |
131 |
|
|
7.4.1 More Cohesive Regions Are Happier on Average |
132 |
|
|
7.4.2 Individual Subjective Well-Being Is Higher in More Cohesive Regions |
132 |
|
|
7.4.3 Are Cohesive Regions Good for Everyone? |
134 |
|
|
References |
135 |
|
|
8 Conclusion and Outlook |
137 |
|
|
Abstract |
137 |
|
|
8.1 Summary and Discussion |
137 |
|
|
8.2 Future Research |
141 |
|
|
References |
142 |
|
|
Appendix |
143 |
|