|
Preface |
6 |
|
|
Contents |
9 |
|
|
Abstract |
13 |
|
|
1 Introduction |
14 |
|
|
1.1 General |
14 |
|
|
1.2 Safety Aspects |
16 |
|
|
References |
16 |
|
|
2 The Structural Hot-Spot Stress Approach to Fatigue Analysis |
18 |
|
|
2.1 Field of Application |
18 |
|
|
2.2 Types of Hot Spot |
19 |
|
|
2.3 Definition of the Structural Stress at a Type “a” Hot-Spot |
20 |
|
|
2.4 Use of Stress Concentration Factors |
22 |
|
|
2.4.1 Modified Nominal Stress |
22 |
|
|
2.4.2 Structural Stress Concentration Factors, Ks |
22 |
|
|
2.4.3 Stress Magnification Factor Due to Misalignment Km |
23 |
|
|
2.5 Effect of Component Size on the Fatigue Resistance |
25 |
|
|
References |
25 |
|
|
3 Experimental Determination of the Structural Hot-Spot Stress |
26 |
|
|
3.1 General |
26 |
|
|
3.2 Type “a” Hot Spots |
26 |
|
|
3.3 Type “b” Hot Spots |
28 |
|
|
References |
29 |
|
|
4 Structural Hot-Spot Stress Determination Using Finite Element Analysis |
30 |
|
|
4.1 General |
30 |
|
|
4.2 Choice of Element Type |
31 |
|
|
4.3 Methods for Determination of Structural Hot-Spot Stress |
32 |
|
|
4.3.1 Determination of the Structural Stress at the Weld Toe Using Through-Thickness Linearization |
33 |
|
|
4.3.2 Determination of the Structural Stress at the Weld Toe Using Surface Stress Extrapolation |
34 |
|
|
4.3.3 Determination of the Structural Stress at a Single Point Close to the Weld Toe |
38 |
|
|
4.4 Use of Relatively Coarse Element Meshes |
39 |
|
|
4.4.1 Solid Element Modelling |
39 |
|
|
4.4.2 Thin Shell (or Plate) Element Modelling |
40 |
|
|
4.4.3 Hot-Spot Stress Extrapolation |
40 |
|
|
4.5 Use of Relatively Fine Element Meshes |
41 |
|
|
4.5.1 Solid Element Modelling |
41 |
|
|
4.5.2 Thin Shell (or Plate) Element Modelling |
42 |
|
|
4.5.3 Hot-Spot Stress Extrapolation |
42 |
|
|
4.6 Modelling Fillet Welds in Shell Element Models |
42 |
|
|
References |
43 |
|
|
5 Parametric Formulae |
45 |
|
|
5.1 Misalignment |
45 |
|
|
5.1.1 Axial Misalignment Between Flat Plates of Equal Thickness Under Axial Loading |
45 |
|
|
5.1.2 Axial Misalignment Between Flat Plates of Differing Thickness Under Axial Loading |
46 |
|
|
5.1.3 Axial Misalignment Between Tubes or Pipes Under Axial Loading |
46 |
|
|
5.1.4 Axial Misalignment at Joints in Pressurized Cylindrical Shells with Thickness Change |
47 |
|
|
5.1.5 Angular Misalignment Between Flat Plates of Equal Thickness Under Axial Loading |
47 |
|
|
5.1.6 Angular Misalignment at Longitudinal Joints in Pressurized Cylindrical Shells |
48 |
|
|
5.1.7 Ovality in Pressurized Cylindrical Pipes and Shells |
49 |
|
|
5.2 Structural Discontinuities |
49 |
|
|
References |
50 |
|
|
6 Structural Hot-Spot S-N Curves |
51 |
|
|
6.1 General Principles |
51 |
|
|
6.2 Recommended S-N Curves for the Conventional Structural Hot-Spot Stress Approach |
54 |
|
|
6.2.1 Hot-Spot S-N Curves |
54 |
|
|
6.2.2 Hot-Spot S-N Curves for Tubular Joints in Steel |
55 |
|
|
6.3 Recommended S-N Curves for the Other Structural Stress Approaches |
55 |
|
|
6.3.1 Structural Stress Approach According to Dong |
55 |
|
|
6.3.2 Structural Stress Approach According to Xiao and Yamada |
56 |
|
|
6.3.3 Structural Stress Approach According to Haibach |
56 |
|
|
References |
56 |
|
|
7 Case Study 1: Box Beam of a Railway Wagon |
58 |
|
|
7.1 Introduction |
58 |
|
|
7.2 Materials and Methods |
58 |
|
|
7.2.1 Description of the Structure |
58 |
|
|
7.2.2 Angular Misalignment in the Web |
58 |
|
|
7.2.3 Strain Gauge Measurements |
59 |
|
|
7.2.4 Structural Hot-Spot Stress Determination |
60 |
|
|
7.2.5 S-N Curve |
61 |
|
|
7.2.6 Partial Safety Factors |
62 |
|
|
7.3 Results |
62 |
|
|
7.3.1 Stress Concentration Factor, Ks |
62 |
|
|
7.3.2 Results for a Perfectly Straight Web |
62 |
|
|
7.3.3 Effective Magnification Factor, Km |
63 |
|
|
7.3.4 Results for a Web with Angular Misalignment |
64 |
|
|
7.4 Discussion and Conclusions |
64 |
|
|
8 Case Study 2: Hatch Corner Design for Container Ships |
66 |
|
|
8.1 Introduction |
66 |
|
|
8.2 Materials and Methods |
66 |
|
|
8.2.1 Description of the Structure |
66 |
|
|
8.2.2 Service Loads |
66 |
|
|
8.2.3 Experimental Investigation |
67 |
|
|
8.2.4 Structural Hot-Spot Stress Determination |
68 |
|
|
8.2.5 S-N Curve Based on Nominal Stress |
69 |
|
|
8.3 Fatigue Assessment |
70 |
|
|
8.4 Conclusion |
70 |
|
|
Reference |
70 |
|
|
9 Case Study 3: Web Frame Corner |
71 |
|
|
9.1 Introduction |
71 |
|
|
9.2 Computation of the Structural Hot-Spot Stress |
72 |
|
|
9.2.1 Finite Element Modelling |
72 |
|
|
9.2.2 Computation of Structural Hot-Spot Stresses |
73 |
|
|
9.3 Fatigue Tests |
74 |
|
|
9.3.1 Performance of the Tests |
74 |
|
|
9.3.2 Observed Fatigue Lives |
74 |
|
|
9.3.3 Comparison with Design S-N Curves |
75 |
|
|
Reference |
76 |
|
|
10 Case Study 4: Loaded Stiffener on T-Bar |
77 |
|
|
10.1 Introduction |
77 |
|
|
10.2 Computation of the Structural Hot-Spot Stress |
77 |
|
|
10.2.1 Finite Element Modelling |
77 |
|
|
10.2.2 Determination of the Structural Hot-Spot Stress by Extrapolation |
79 |
|
|
10.2.3 Determination of the Structural Stress According to Dong |
80 |
|
|
10.2.4 Determination of the Structural Stress According to Xiao/Yamada |
82 |
|
|
10.3 Estimation of the Design Fatigue Life |
82 |
|
|
10.3.1 Fatigue Life Determined from Extrapolated Stress |
82 |
|
|
10.3.2 Fatigue Life Determined from Dong’s Approach |
82 |
|
|
10.3.3 Fatigue Life Determined from Xiao/Yamada’s Approach |
83 |
|
|
10.3.4 Comparison with Test Results |
83 |
|
|
References |
83 |
|
|
Appendix |
84 |
|
|
Symbols |
84 |
|